SAMR in Action: Reflections from a Business Ethics Classroom
SAMR in Action: Reflections from a Business Ethics Classroom
Before I became familiar with Puentedura’s SAMR model, I
didn’t realize I was already navigating through its layers in my teaching
practice. As a high school General Business teacher, I’ve seen how the
integration of technology can vary dramatically depending on the group of
students I’m working with. Some years, students rise through the SAMR levels
with energy and creativity. Other years, simply reaching the basic "Substitution"
stage feels like climbing a huge mountain.
In one unit on Business Ethics, I’ve tried to make the topic
more engaging and relevant by assigning a video presentation project. Through
the years, I’ve observed this single assignment take on different forms, each
reflecting a different level of the SAMR model.
Substitution
Students create a basic video where they read from a script
that essentially mirrors the textbook content, using a smartphone camera or a simple
editing app. There’s no real enhancement to the learning—just a replacement of a
simple class presentation with a recorded version.
The task remains the
same, and technology only changes the medium, not the quality or interactivity
of the learning.
Augmentation
In better-performing groups, students use tools like Canva
or Prezi to add animated graphics, subtitles, or music. They might use video
editing apps to adjust clips, clean up audio, and present more polished
projects.
These features enhance the final product and slightly
improve engagement and understanding. The tech adds functional value without
fundamentally changing the task.
Modification
Some groups go further, interviewing local business owners
about ethical dilemmas and incorporating real-world insights. They then analyze
the responses and link them to class concepts, using video editing tools to
create a documentary-style presentation.
The assignment
transforms into a more complex and authentic task. Students apply critical
thinking and research skills, and the tech reshapes how they approach and
present the lesson.
Redefinition
In the most motivated years, students take ownership of the
entire process: filming on location at actual businesses, scripting original
scenarios, and even posting their work on school social media or class group
chats. They create follow-up quizzes using Google or Kahoot and lead class
discussions.
These students are
creating content that wouldn't be possible without technology. They’re moving
beyond the classroom, interacting with the stakeholders, and turning a class
project into a mass educational tool.
The Reality Check
What struck me most while reflecting on the SAMR model is
how much student engagement drives the level we reach. With enthusiastic
groups, the model naturally unfolds—technology becomes a bridge to deeper
learning. But in less motivated classes, even the best-designed project can
fall flat. Sometimes, it feels like you're dragging students through
Substitution when you know they’re capable of more.
This is a powerful reminder, technology alone isn’t
transformative. The culture of the classroom, student involvement, and
relevance of the task all play important roles.
Comments
Post a Comment